Application security and DevSecOps consulting for threat modeling, secure code review, software supply chains, and security controls in delivery pipelines.
Application Security & DevSecOps, with a clear purpose.
Application security here means controls that live inside the workflow your engineers already run, so each becomes a step the team follows rather than a review at the end. Four focused services cover the lifecycle in order. Threat modeling catches design flaws before code exists. Secure code review reads the paths that matter by hand at a fixed point in time. Software supply chain security governs how outside code enters your builds and how the software you ship is built, signed, and verified. Pipeline integration places automated and manual checks into the delivery pipeline your team already uses, each producing a record that becomes evidence at release. The work is framed against recognized secure-development practices and mapped to the compliance obligations you carry. The same principal scopes, performs, and reports every engagement: scope agreed in writing, hands-on work coordinated with your developers, findings with reproduction steps and fixes, then a retest with evidence.
A GOOD FIT WHEN
For CTOs, engineering managers, and product security leads whose customers, agencies, or auditors ask for a software bill of materials, evidence of secure development, or proof that security is built into how you ship. Also for teams rebuilding a delivery pipeline or recovering from a dependency or pipeline compromise.
THE WORK BEHIND THE SERVICE
What we do. What you can use.
01
Scope the stage that hurts first
We start from your delivery workflow as it is: repositories, build platform, registries, and the path to production. Together we pick which of the four services apply and what to touch first, usually a design awaiting review, a release path a customer has asked about, or a pipeline. Scope, read-only access, and a named engineer are agreed in writing. No production data is needed.
02
Work inside your repos and pipelines
Workshops run with your architects and developers, code review happens against a fixed point in the code, and pipeline changes arrive as proposed changes through your normal review. Proven analysis and scanning tools steer the work, but a person judges every result. Every finding shows the exact location, a reproduction or trace, and a fix written for the owner.
03
Hand over evidence, then retest
You keep the artifacts: a threat register and reusable model, code findings with reusable detection rules for your pipeline, a build-integrity rating for each pipeline, and a design for signing and verifying what you ship. The checklist of gates comes with an evidence index tied to recognized secure-development practices. After remediation we retest at a later point and package the evidence for customers and auditors.
Assessment and hardening of how packages enter your builds, how artifacts are built and signed, and whether anything verifies provenance before deploy.
How outside code enters your builds, from public and private sources: a controlled gateway, pinned versions, and how advisories are handled
The build-integrity level each pipeline reaches, with the gap to the level your customers ask for
Your software bill of materials checked against current expectations and regenerated with every release
Automated and manual security gates placed in the pipeline you already run, each with a blocking rule, an owner, and an artifact that becomes evidence at release.
A review of each pipeline against the common ways delivery pipelines are attacked and recognized hardening guidance
Pipeline identity: what each job is allowed to do, long-lived access tokens, and short-lived cloud credentials in place of stored keys
Build steps that can be poisoned: triggers that run untrusted contributions, untrusted code pulled into a build, and injection through build inputs